Archive | Student Pieces RSS feed for this section

Nuclear Intentions and Implied Preemption: How Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin Gives Indian Point a Fighting Chance to Stay in Business

Zachary Mason The Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, New York, is the subject of a legal power play between regulators in Albany and Washington. NYSDEC denied Indian Point a certification of compliance with Clean Water Act standards – a move which could force the closure of the nuclear power plant. But the Atomic Energy […]

Comments { 0 }

Pay-to-Play: The Impact of Group Purchasing Organizations on Drug Shortages

Christian DeRoo Read the full article

Comments { 0 }

The Poli-Intel Industry: Considering the Common Law’s Application in Insider Trading Under the Stock Act

Ernie C. Jolly Read the full article

Comments { 0 }

Ignoring the Technicality’s Temptation: Interpreting the Citizenship of a Foreign Official Under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

Elizabeth Grant This Comment argues that, while the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) excludes those with U.S. citizenship from being “foreign officials” to protect defendants from an ambiguous criminal statute, businesses should structure compliance programs to treat “foreign officials” as including those with U.S. citizenship. The FCPA prohibits bribing “foreign officials,” but it does not […]

Comments { 0 }

Petitioning for Cash: How Domestic Industries Exploit Antidumping Procedures and Antitrust Exceptions to Force their Foreign Competitors into Lucrative Settlement Agreements

Daniel Fullerton Read the full article

Comments { 0 }

Can’t See The Forest For The Trees: Where Does A Purchase Or Sale Of Securities Occur?

CHRISTOPHER CALFEE Whether Justice Scalia chopped down the “judicial oak which ha[d] grown from little more than a legislative acorn” or cleared an entire forest of “botanically distinct tree[s]” when he created the transactional test in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, Ltd., he undoubtedly changed the legal landscape for both international and antifraud securities laws. The […]

Comments are closed

Is Judge Rakoff Asking For Too Much? The New Standard For Consent Judgement Settlements With The SEC

AMANDA S. NAOUFAL In SEC v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Judge Rakoff rejected a $285 million settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) and Citigroup. The complaint alleged that Citigroup failed to disclose its role in the selection of assets for a billion dollar collaterized debt obligation. Judge Rakoff rejected the consent […]

Comments are closed

Forward-Looking Improvements To Licensing The Next Generation Of Nuclear Reactors

ARJUN PRASAD Nuclear regulation has faced a variety of challenges since the Atomic Energy Commission first introduced the procedure of two-step licensing, in which construction and operational licenses are issued separately to nuclear reactor developers. Since 1974, and the establishment of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the process for licensing a nuclear power plant has changed […]

Comments are closed

Made In America: A Comparative Analysis Of Copyright Law Protections For Fashion Design In Asia And The United States

ALEXANDRA MACKEY The fashion industry is a global industry, generating $1.2 trillion in revenue.  Consequently, the question of whether—and to what extent—fashion designers can protect their works under the intellectual property laws of their country is hotly debated.  In Asia, the answer to this question varies from country to country. In India, for instance, fashion […]

Comments { 0 }

A Risk Not Worth The Reward: The Stored Communications Act And Employers’ Collection Of Employees’ And Job Applicants’ Social Networking Passwords

NICHOLAS D. BEADLE Recent news reports have documented how some employers have collected social networking passwords from employees and job applicants in an attempt to evade privacy protections that might prevent them from tracking employees and applicants’ online activity.  The Federal Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) requires an employer to secure an employee or applicant’s knowing […]

Comments { 0 }